Architect vs. Design & Build – What’s Right for Your London Home?
- Mariam E.

- Jun 9
- 2 min read
Updated: Jun 18

Understand the Key Differences & Choose the Best Route for Your Project
Planning a renovation, extension, or new build in London? One of the first big decisions you'll face is how to approach the design and construction process. Do you hire an architect separately — or go with a design & build company that manages the entire project from start to finish?
Both routes can lead to a successful outcome, but they offer very different experiences in terms of cost, control, risk, and coordination. In this article, we break down the pros and cons of each approach to help you decide what’s right for your home and budget
What Does an Architect Do?
An architect focuses primarily on the design side of your project. Their role includes:
Creating concept and planning drawings
Preparing detailed technical drawings
Navigating planning permission and building regulations
Sometimes overseeing the project as contract administrator
Pros of Hiring an Architect:
Creative, bespoke design tailored to your vision
Independent professional acting on your behalf
Flexibility to tender the build to multiple contractors
Potential Drawbacks:
You’ll need to separately manage the builder, engineer, and any planning consultants
Risk of design vs build misalignment (what’s drawn vs what’s practical)
Higher total cost due to layered services
What is a Design & Build Company?
A design & build company (like Morphos Group Ltd) handles the entire process under one roof, including:
Design & architectural drawings
Planning applications and permissions
Structural engineering
Project management and full construction delivery
Pros of Design & Build:
One team, one contract – less stress and miscommunication
Faster turnaround from concept to completion
Better cost control and real-world design practicality
Usually more affordable overall
Considerations:
Less “independent” oversight (you’re relying on one company’s integrity)
Creative design may be less “artsy” and more practical (depending on the firm)
Which Is Better for Your London Project?
Criteria | Architect Route | Design & Build |
Design freedom | ✔️ Higher | ✔️ Moderate to High |
Project control | ✔️ More client-led | ✔️ More company-led |
Simplicity | ❌ Multiple parties | ✔️ One point of contact |
Budget control | ❌ Less predictable | ✔️ Better fixed pricing |
Speed | ❌ Slower (sequential) | ✔️ Faster (overlapping stages) |
Best for… | High-end or unique designs | Busy homeowners, families, investors |
Real-Life Example (London Homeowner)
Lucy & James in North London wanted a 6m rear extension and loft conversion. They chose a design & build company to handle everything — including planning, drawings, and construction — and completed their project in 5 months, saving over £6,000 compared to architect + separate builder quotes.
Final Thoughts
Choosing between an architect and a design & build company depends on your budget, project size, and how involved you want to be.If you value simplicity, speed, and a single team accountable for the result, design & build is often the ideal choice — especially for projects like extensions, conversions, or new builds in London.
Ready to Start Your Project the Simple Way?
At Morphos Group Ltd, we provide fully integrated design & build services across London — from concept to completion, with all planning, drawings, and building handled in-house.
.png)



Comments